Fixed-time artificial insemination: reproductive efficiency and economic benefit

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69504/nau.v4i7.84

Keywords:

protocol, GnRH, IATF

Abstract

The economic evaluation was carried out using the income method. The results show that the application of GnRH significantly impacted reproductive efficiency, obtaining percentages of gestation at first service (GPS) of 0.70 ± 0.07 versus 0.58 ± 0.09 without GnRH, and total gestation (GT) of 0.82 versus 0.68, respectively. Although the cost per protocol with GnRH was slightly higher ($44.01 USD) compared to the protocol without GnRH ($42.28 USD), cost effectiveness analysis revealed a superior economic benefit with GnRH. Specifically, the cost per pregnant cow at first service with GnRH was 62.95 USD, significantly lower than the 72.81 USD without GnRH. Similarly, the cost per total gestation with GnRH was reduced to USD 50.56 versus USD 61.99 without GnRH. In conclusion, treatment with GnRH proved to be more efficient and economically advantageous, achieving higher gestation percentages at a lower cost per pregnant animal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar B, U., Bueno D, H.M., Pérez S, J.M., Lagunes L, J., Román P, H., & Rodríguez C, M.A. (2011). Manual de evaluación económica para ranchos ganaderos. Publicación especial. Campo Experimental La Posta, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Veracruz, México. 22 pp.

Agutu, F. O, Mbuku, S. M., Ondiek, J. O., & Bebe, B. O. (2024). Economic viability of using OvSynch and fixed timed artificial insemination protocol in breeding improvement of pastoral herds in the rangelands. Tropical animal health and production, 56(68). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-03907-1

Barrón, B. O. G., Avilés R. R., Sahagún, Á. C. A., Alcalá, R. J. S. G. J., Arispe, V. J., & Garza, C. R. D. (2023). Caracterización de unidades de producción familiar de bovinos, Llera, Tamaulipas, México. Abanico Boletín Técnico, 2, 1-21.

Bó, G. A., y Baruselli, P. S. (2014). Sincronización de la ovulación y la inseminación artificial a tiempo fijo en ganado vacuno. Animación. En t. J.Anim. Biosci. 8, 144-150.

Carvalho, B., Sá, C., Cavalcante, F., Júnior, J., & Bayma, M. (2016). Economic impact of artificial insemination and fixed-time AI in dairy herd in Acre state. Animal reproduction, 13, 456-456.

Carvalho, R., Cooke, R., Cappellozza, B., Peres, R., Pohler, K., & Vasconcelos, J. (2022). Influence of body condition score and its change after parturition on pregnancy rates to fixed-timed artificial insemination in Bos indicus beef cows. Animal reproduction science, 243, 107028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2022.107028

Cuevas, R. V., Rosales N, C. (2018). Characterization of the dual-purpose bovine system in northwest Mexico: producers, resources and problematic. Rev. Mvz Córdoba, 23(1), 6448-6460.

Fernández, R., Biga, P., Di Masso, R. J., & Marini, P. (2020). Economic evaluation of productive and reproductive indicators in dairy cows with different ages at first calving, in grazing systems. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 54(4), 493–501.

Ferraz, J., Eler, J., & Rezende, F. (2012). Impact of using artificial insemination on the multiplication of high genetic merit beef cattle in Brazil. Animal reproduction, 9, 133-138.

Galina, C. S., & Geffroy, M. (2023). Ganado de doble propósito criado en condiciones tropicales: ¿Cuáles son sus deficiencias en una buena función productiva y reproductiva? Animales. 2023, 13(13), 2224.

Gudiño, & Villagómez. (2024). La importancia del análisis económico en ciencias agroalimentarias. Primera jornada de difusión y divulgación de las ciencias económico administrativas. CITEC. Universidad de Guadalajara.

Gudiño, E. R. S. (2019). Potencial del extensionismo pecuario, con la aplicación del MIRB (Manejo integral de la reproducción bovina) en el ganado Veracruzano. Memorias del XLIII Congreso Nacional de Buiatría, Boca del Río Veracruz. 44-69.

INEGI. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Geografía e Informática. (2018). Marco Geoestadístico. Panorama sociodemográfico de México. México. INEGI. http://www3.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/biblioteca/ficha.aspx?upc=702825078065

López V. O., Sánchez S. T., Iglesias G. J. M., Lamela L. L., Soca P. M., & Arece G.J., (2017). Los sistemas silvopastoriles como alternativa para la producción animal sostenible en el contexto actual de la ganadería tropical. Pastos y Forrajes, 40, 83-95.

Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A., & Somerville, S. H. (1976). Condition Scoring of Cattle. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, boletín núm. 6.

Medina, A. S. (2022). 28° DIA DEL GANADERO. 28º Día del Ganadero 2022 CEIEGT FMVZ UNAM, 69.

Meneghetti, M., Sá Filho, O. G., Peres, R. F. G., Lamb, G. C., & Vasconcelos, J. L. M. (2009). Fixed- time artificial insemination with estradiol and progesterone for Bos indicus cows I: basis for development of protocols. Theriogenology, 72(2), 179-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.02.010

Morotti, F., Gomes dos Santos, G. M., Silva-Santos, K. C., Ayres Dias, J. H., & Seneda, M. M. (2025). Strategic use of estrus intensity to combine timed artificial insemination and embryo transfer in large-scale cattle reproduction programs. Theriogenology, 235(15 de marzo de 2025), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2025.01.009

Patterson, D. J., Cooke, R. F., Dahlke, G. R., Funston, R. N., Hall, J. B., Lamb, G. C., Lauderdale, J., Perry, G. A., & Van Eenennaam, A. L. (2016). Physiological and management advances enhancing adoption of applied reproductive management procedures in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science, 94(Issue suppl_5 de octubre de 2016), 560-561. https://doi.org/10.2527/jam2016-1168

Pellegrino, C. A. G., Morotti, F., Untura, R. M., Pontes, J. H. F., Pellegrino, M. F. O., Campolina, J. P., Seneda, M. M., Barbosa, F. A., & Henry, M. (2016). Use of sexed sorted semen for fixed-time artificial insemination or fixed-time embryo transfer of in vitro-produced embryos in cattle. Theriogenology, 86(3), 888-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.03.010

Pérez-Ruiz, E., Quezada-Casasola, A., Carrera-Chávez, J. M., Álvarez-Holguín, A., Ochoa Rivero, J. M., Chávez-Ruiz, M. G., & Román-Ponce, S. I. (2022). Función ovárica y respuesta a la sincronización del estro en ganado Criollo en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuaria, 13(2), 422-451. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i2.6032

Rodgers, J. C., Bird, S. L., Larson, J. E., Dilorenzo, N., Dahlen, C. R., DiCostanzo, A., & Lamb, G. C. (2012). An economic evaluation of estrous synchronization and timed artificial insemination in suckled beef cows. Journal of Animal Science, 90(11), 4055-4062. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4836

Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera SIAP. (2018). La ganadería: símbolo de fortaleza del campo mexicano.

Sitko, E. M., Di Croce, F. A., McNeel, A. K., Weigel, D. J., & Giordano, J. O. (2023). Effect of reproductive management programs that prioritized artificial insemination at detected estrus or timed artificial insemination on the economic performance of primiparous Holstein cows of different genetic merit for fertility. Journal of Dairy Science, 106(9), 6495-6514. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-22674

Vasconcelos, J. L. M., Pereira, M. H. C., Wiltbank, M. C., Guida, T. G., Lopes, F. R., Sanches, C. P., Barbosa, L. F. D. S. P., Costa, W. M., & Munhoz, A. K. (2018). Evolution of fixed-time AI in dairy cattle in Brazil. Anim. Reprod., 15(Suppl 1), 940–951. https://doi.org/10.21451/1984-3143AR2018-0020

Velázquez Penagos, H., Galindo Rodríguez, L., Barrientos Morales, M., Galina Hidalgo, C. S., Maquivar Linfoot, M. G., & Montiel Palacios, F. (2020). Effect of the Technological Status of Small Cow-Calf Farm Producers on the Induction to Resumption of Ovarian Activity of Dual Purpose Cattle Raised under Topical Conditions. Open Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 10(11), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2020.1011017

Published

2025-03-30

How to Cite

Gudiño Escandón, R. S., García Barradas, M. del R., & Vega Murillo, V. E. (2025). Fixed-time artificial insemination: reproductive efficiency and economic benefit. Nau Yuumak Avances De Investigación En Organizaciones Y Gestión, 4(7), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.69504/nau.v4i7.84

Issue

Section

Reportes de investigación

Metrics